WHY DO WE LIKE QUIRKY CHARACTERS?
Is there a right way to develop a character?
Recently, I
attended a writer’s workshop presented by the St. George 2014 Book Festival on
the Dixie State University campus. Among
many great presentations, I attended a class by Dean Hughes called An Effective Writing Process. Mr. Hughes has been writing for several
decades and has published more than 100 books, both fiction and non-fiction,
for all ages.
Mr. Hughes
explained eight rules of writing. Rule One is don't start writing until
you know the main characters. He said
the story comes out of the characters, so invent each key character first.
Do a summary of each character’s life and
personality--really get into the character’s head. Even though much of the character’s summary
will never get into the story, a writer needs the summary to accurately and
consistently describe what the character thinks, says and does, because that
controls the direction the story will go.
By the way, one cure for writer’s block is to reanalyze (even rewrite) key
character summaries. Another cure is to take a break and get something to eat.
Character
development is a critical writing skill that is handled differently by
different writers, but much of the strength of the story is built on the
reader’s love (or hate) for the story’s key characters. What is the best way to create a protagonist
that readers will bond with or an antagonist that readers will loathe? The correct answer depends on the writer’s
personal style and writing skills.
Working
together, my brother Andy and I are co-writing The Dimensions in Death series, a young-adult horror series--the third book, FATAL GREEN, comes out this year. As the story develops, I am
fascinated by my brother’s thought processes and writing techniques. In connection with the issue of character
development, Andy has shared the following insight into his personal style:
<> <>
<>
A Few Thoughts on
Character Development
(Or what I DID by the
seat of my pants.)
By A. L. Washburn
Dissociative
identity disorder (DID) is the technical name for what we laymen refer to as a multiple or split personality. It is a
controversial diagnosis with some experts believing it is not real, or maybe
even therapist induced. (Isn’t Wikipedia
wonderful?) I bring this up, because I
sometimes believe I may have a form of DID, though I have never seen a
therapist. (I was going to say, “Where
is the fun for a writer in having a mental disorder if you get it fixed?” but
then I worried that someone with a real mental disorder would be offended, and
yes, I think that people with mental disorders are the most likely readers of my
stuff. Whatever.)
Andy on the Fly Las Vegas NV Airport |
When I’m
writing, I believe I have multiple personalities all battling to get out, or at
least take control of the writing process.
And, most of these personalities, wait, no, all of these personalities
are younger than me; healthier than me; and without a doubt, thinner and better
looking than me. The sixteen year old
personality is especially keen to take over.
He must not have caught a look of me lately in the mirror.
It is from
these disparate and distinct personalities that I form the characters I write
about in my novels. To some extent or
another, everyone I write about, or maybe I should say, everyone I write for is down inside my id somewhere. (Damn, I am esoteric!) So, when I write about different people I am
really just writing about some part of myself.
I am the young, good looking, high school football star, Cal. I am
also the middle aged, overweight, balding, mean and obnoxious Mr. Samuel. (Both are characters in PITCH GREEN.)
In real
life, I am not young or good looking, but neither am I mean or balding. I’m only a little obnoxious. But both these characters are inside me. I only need to bring them out and put them in
the story to write about them. I am not
writing about people I observe, though I love to observe people. I am writing about myself. No matter how different or unique each
character is from the others, I’m there.
Of course,
this begs the question: What about the female characters? (My sons will stop reading right
exactly at this point.) If I were cool, and politically correct, I would claim to have female personalities along
with male personalities. But I’m only
cool, not politically correct, and no matter how deep I look inside me, I do
not find a woman, or even any female-type being. My wife will confirm this.
This does
not mean I cannot write for the women in my story. Women are people (which sounds so
patronizing), and people overlap as people, so I don’t have a problem writing
from a woman’s perspective, as long as I have women, like my wife and
daughters, who read what I write and then tell me when I have it wrong.
A microscopic view inside one of Andy's brain cells. |
This means,
analogous with the way I write for guys, when I write for women, I look out
their eyes at the world that is being created for them. So, if I’m not part woman, (there are
bullies from my high school days who claim otherwise), the women that I write
about are part me. (I said I was
esoteric.)
The way this
works, evidently, is the guys I write for are looking out my eyes as I
write. But as I write for the women, I am looking out their eyes. Weird, huh?
But, that is the way it works, and for me, it works pretty well. So far, I like the characters that grow up on
the pages of my stories.
Whether or
not this means I have DID, I don’t know.
Though it is probably indicative of a need to at least go to
therapy. Yea, well, I’m still not
going. Why mess with all those extra
personalities? I need them to keep my id
in balance as well as when I’m developing new story characters. After all, that’s how I write.
<> <>
<>
Now, while
drawing on multiple or split personalities may not work well for all writers, I agree with
Andy that it doesn’t hurt to be a little bit crazy and that a whole lot of
creativity can come out of being in touch with the crazy side of your own id.
Taking the
character development process a step further, I got some good pointers in a
class on Plot, Character and Conflict
presented by Teri Harman at that same Book Festival workshop mentioned
above. Ms. Harman has published a young-adult
fiction series of magic and wonder (BLOOD MOON, BLACK MOON, and STORM MOON))
and writes a book column for ksl.com
and contributes regular book segments to Studio 5.
She said
that key characters (both good and bad) must be compelling in at least four
fundamental ways. So, when you summarize
a character’s life, as Mr. Hughes advises, be sure your summary includes strong
descriptive words and in-depth explanations in each of the following four character categories:
1—Be
REAL—create a whole person with real strengths and real flaws (give the person
a balanced history with both good and bad experiences), maybe a person with poor coping skills
in certain situations.
2—Be
UNIQUE—create a personality that is different, quirky and interesting, and
depending on whether your building a protagonist or antagonist, make a person
who is fun or crazy, lovable or scary, timid or wild, etc.
3—Be
FLAWED—create an emotional or moral expectation that exceeds the person’s
current commitment level or capability to comply; allow the person to disappoint herself as
well as others, but then allow the person to learn and grow.
4—Be
COMPLICATED—create both an internal as well as external conflict of good and
evil; allow the person to be spontaneous, out of character when under stress, surprised
by her own actions in new situations.
In Andy’s
esoteric musings above, he mentioned that he loves to observe people. So do I, especially when they’re unconsciously
showing part of their crazy side. Next
week we’ll speak to the benefits of people-watching as that might help us polish our character-development skills.
Great stuff! Thanks for posting.
ReplyDeleteThank you. I appreciate your comments.
ReplyDelete